I’m a TED junkie, and I love watching videos from some of the most brilliant minds today. Here is a recent talk from a British author named Matt Ridley that I absolutely loved, with one of the best titles for a talk I’ve ever seen. This is a profound 16 minutes if you take the time to watch it.
Egypt Reflections Pt.2
One of the things that was amazing to me about being in Egypt is how much of their history reinforces and further explains things that I’ve read about in the Bible for years. There were two areas where this really stood out to me.
First, Egyptian culture in general. One of the nights we were there we took a boat trip around on the Nile River. We had a local Muslim friend with us and he was telling us about Egyptian culture while we did it. He told us that Egyptians have always been laid back and content because the Nile has always made life easy. He described how food has always been easy to get because of the river and as a result part of their DNA as a people is to be laid back and relaxed. It was relatively easy for them to have the things they needed to survive. As I thought of that, it suddenly helped me to understand why the Israelites are so quick to complain to God and Moses about food shortages once they leave Egypt. I never really understood how they could look back and miss it (since they were ill-treated slaves) especially when God was bringing them on a new journey to something He called the Promised Land. But it began to make more sense. God was teaching them to depend on Him, and not on the stability of the river and all that it produces. And God’s way of doing things was different than the ebb and flow of the river that they’d grown accustomed to. Fascinating.
The second area of insight for me was the history of the Pharaohs. We spent a day touring the pyramids with a guide, and he told us the history of many of the pharaohs. One of them was Akhenaten. This was who they thought was Pharaoh when Joseph came to Egypt. Now I’ve heard about the Joseph side of the story, but I learned a different side from Egyptian history. Akhenaten is famous for turning the spiritual belief of Egypt from a polytheistic religion to a monotheistic religion. He was the only pharaoh to do this, and it was a huge ordeal as you might imagine. Did his experiences with Joseph cause him to do this? Unfortunately, it didn’t go well for Akhenaten, as ultimately they suspect that the people killed him over it. Oh, and you’ve probably heard of his son, the legendary King Tut. This would also help to explain why Tutankhamun became pharaoh at only age nine. Interesting.
The other pharaoh that was insightful was Ramses II. This is the guy thought to be pharaoh at the time of Moses when God brought the Israelites out of Egypt. What I never knew is that Egyptians love Ramses II (this actually surprised me at first). According to the great Wikipedia, he is “often regarded as Egypt’s greatest, most celebrated, and most powerful pharaoh.” It helps one of the more difficult stories in the Bible to make more sense. Often people struggle with the explanations in Exodus that God hardened pharaoh’s heart. But if Ramses II was indeed the pharaoh, this was already a very proud and stubborn person who spent a lot of time creating giant monuments about himself and attempting to conquer other regions. It makes the comparison of what God did despite him even more striking. “…the weakness of God is stronger than human strength.” (1 Corinthians 1:25) I also had the chance to look at Ramses’ mummy, which is very well preserved. It was crazy to look at his face and realize that this was likely the face that Moses was looking at during the great story of the Exodus.
Here is a before (a giant statue of Ramses II) and after (his mummy in the Cairo Museum) picture of Ramses II.


Abe Lincoln Gets Snoped
In light of the book I just finished, and the book I’m soon to begin about Abraham Lincoln, I came across a new Snopes article that details the fact from the legend when it comes to our most famous president. Did Lincoln really endure “constant failure and defeat from the time he was born until he was elected President?”

An Amazing Story
In case you haven’t seen the commercial telling the story of Norma McCorvey, aka Jane Roe, please watch this video. Her situation changed how our entire country operates (perhaps you’ve ever heard of Roe v. Wade?) and now her story has an amazing new twist. You can find out more at virtuemedia.org
The Cause or the Man?
I’m approaching 200 pages of my first Lincoln book of two this winter, and I came across an incredible story. On February 8, 1855, Lincoln was running to be a senator of Illinios. He needed 51 votes to win. This was when senators were chosen by the politicians themselves instead of the vote of the people. At one point in the voting, Lincoln had 47 votes acquired, only 4 short of victory. The senators basically boiled down to three groups: the Whigs (which represented the 47 votes for Lincoln), the “Douglas Democrats” (which were against him by cause and by party so were not voting for him at all), and the “anti-Nebraska Democrats” (who sided with Lincoln’s cause but were against him by party status). His fate lay in the hands of 4 senators from this last party who could easily cross party lines for a vote to include him based on their shared stance against slavery. But ultimately, even though it would hurt their cause, they decided that they couldn’t vote for a non-democrat because “having been elected as Democrats…they could not sustain themselves at home.” Basically, it would hurt their career to help their cause. So they did what most of us would do.
This is where the story would normally end. Except, that Lincoln was not a normal leader. “Lincoln concluded that unless his supporters shifted to Trumbull [a senator prospect who was an anti-Nebraska democrat: same cause as Lincoln but different party], the Douglas Democrats…would choose the next senator.” Lincoln told the 47 senators that promised him a vote to switch parties and vote for Trumbull since he shared Lincoln’s view on slavery, even though he was a democrat. This move would guarantee that a senator would be elected who agreed with their cause. If Lincoln didn’t act this way, he told his floor manager that “you will lose both Trumbull and myself and I think the cause in this case is to be preferred to men.”
And so, Lincoln didn’t get elected to the senate. He decided to propel his cause instead of his career. So much so that he “deliberately showed up at Trumbull’s victory party, with a smile on his face and a warm handshake for the victor.” And yet it is moments like these that defined Lincoln and ultimately pushed him toward the presidency of the United States. “While Seward and Chase [Lincoln's later presidential rivals] would lose friends in victory… Lincoln, in defeat, gained friends.”
A story like this causes you to reflect. What do we choose when we are put into this same situation? Is our career, or ambition in general, more important than our cause? Or, do we believe in our cause so passionately that we will advance it, even if it costs us personally? Whatever your cause may be, I hope that every leader has found something that they can support above themselves and that when the opportunity presents itself, we will choose the cause over the man.